Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 5;91:107262. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107262

Table 4.

GRADE evidence profile of CP for COVID-19 studies.

CP for COVID-19 patients
Patient or population: patients with COVID-19 patients
Settings: RCTs and controlled NRSIs
Intervention: CP for COVID-19 patients
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No of Participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control CP for COVID-19 patients
RCT-mortality

mortality
Study population OR 0.79

(0.52 to 1.19)
734

(4 studies)
⊕⊕⊝⊝

low1
158 per 1000 130 per 1000

(89 to 183)
Moderate
185 per 1000 152 per 1000

(06 to 213)
<10 days-RCT mortality

mortality
Study population OR 0.4

(0.14 to 1.11)
167

(2 studies)
⊕⊕⊝⊝

low1
174 per 1000 78 per 1000

(29 to 190)
Moderate
174 per 1000 78 per 1000

(29 to 190)
controlled NRSIs-mortality

mortality
Study population RR 0.59

(0.53 to 0.66)
7779

(11 studies)
⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low2, 3, 4
297 per 1000 175 per 1000

(157 to 196)
Moderate
286 per 1000 169 per 1000

(152 to 189)
<10 days controlled NRSIs mortality

mortality
Study population RR 0.54

(0.39 to 0.76)
1357

(4 studies)
⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low2, 3, 4
171 per 1000 92 per 1000

(67 to 130)
Moderate
201 per 1000 109 per 1000

(78 to 153)
RCT clinical improvement

clinical improvement
Study population OR 1.21

(0.68 to 2.16)
189

(2 studies)
⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low1, 5
500 per 1000 548 per 1000

(405 to 684)
Moderate
506 per 1000 553 per 1000

(411 to 689)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1

There are too few randomized controlled studies to evaluate the information size and results, so we downgraded two point for imprecision.

2

Controlled non-randomized studies.

3

We downgraded one points because the risk of bias within this study is critical.

4

There were too few studies to evaluate the information size and results, so we downgraded one point for imprecision.

5

Risk of bias within this study is some concerns, so we downgraded one point for risk of bias.