Table 2.
Sensitivity of measurement for contamination measure (separate for microbiological, blood and visual for spatter).
| Blood agar used? | Incubation environment | Incubation duration (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Measurement of microbial contamination | |||
| Low | The study did not use blood agar as growth media. | Aerobic environment was used. | Incubation time (1–3 days) was unsatisfactory for cultivating a wide range of bacteria with different replication rate. |
| Not stated. | Not stated | Not stated. | |
| Moderate | The study used blood agar as growth media. | Aerobic or anaerobic (in consideration to other parameters). | The study used a moderate incubation time for cultivating a moderate range of bacteria with different replication rate. |
| High | The study used blood agar as growth media. | Anaerobic environment was adopted that allowed. | Incubation time (7 days or more) was satisfactory for cultivating a wide range of bacteria with different replication rate. |
| Measurement of blood contamination | |||
| Low | Visible detection with no other equipment used. | ||
| Moderate | Visible detection with the use of visibility of enhancers (e.g. fluorescent dye). | ||
| High | Sophisticated method used for blood detection such as DNA detection with PCR. | ||
| Measurement of non-microbial and non-blood contamination | |||
| Low | Visible detection with no other equipment used. | ||
| Used test with no consideration of dilution effect of blood in interpretation (false negatives). | |||
| Used test with no consideration of impact of hypochlorite in interpretation of surfaces in dental settings (false positives at higher dilutions which is relevant for surfaces rather than gowns/masks/drapes) | |||
| Moderate | Visible detection with the use of visibility of enhancers (e.g. fluorescent dye). | ||
| High | Direct testing; Used agents appropriately, these agents include:
|
||