Table 1.
Dichotomized agreement scores of perceived usefulness by experts and novices in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
| Perceived usefulness items | Experts (n=14), n (%) | Novices (n=9), n (%) | |
| Performance | |||
| Teleguidance can be a way for me to improve my technical skills in ERCPa | 9 (64) | 7 (78) | |
| The ERCP that we perform are challenging enough for teleguidance to be of value | 7 (50) | 6 (67) | |
| Overall, teleguidance would be beneficial for the quality and patient safety of the ERCP that we perform | 11 (79) | 8 (89) | |
| Teleguidance would help to further develop the ERCP activities at this clinic | 10 (71) | 8 (89) | |
| Effectiveness and productivity | |||
| Teleguidance would allow my patients to get the appropriate treatment faster | 10 (71) | 6 (67) | |
| Teleguidance can allow my patients to receive a better ERCP treatment | 11 (79) | 8 (89) | |
| Teleguidance would allow us to perform a greater number of ERCP procedures | 8 (57) | 4 (44) | |
| Teleguidance can help me get the most out of the time I set aside for ERCP | 8 (57) | 7 (78) | |
aERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.