Table 2.
Feasibility, usability, and satisfaction assessment scoresa (N=96).b
| Item | Physicians (n=25) | Nurses (n=44) | NASF-ABc (n=27) | Total | |
| Feasibility, median (IQR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application can be used in primary care setting | 4 (4-5) | 5.00 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It is easy to be incorporated in work routine | 4 (2-5) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (3-4) | 4 (3-4) |
|
|
It does not cause significant delays in daily routine | 2 (2-3) | 3 (2-4) | 4 (3-4) | 3 (2-4) |
| Usability, median (IQR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, evaluation is good | 4 (3.25-4.75) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
The screens are easy to understand | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-4.5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
I was able to find the information I was looking for | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-4) |
|
|
The definitions of comorbidities are clear | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-4.75) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-4) |
|
|
The fields are easy to fill | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It has proper interface | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It is stable during the use | 4 (2-4) | 3 (2-4) | 3 (2-4) | 3 (2-4) |
| Utility, median (IQR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The application might improve patient care | 4 (4-5) | 5 (4-5) | 5 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
The recommendations brought new information on hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular risk | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It was useful to calculate the cardiovascular risk | 4 (4-4.75) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It was useful to promote cardiovascular disease prevention | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It assisted me to treat my patients | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It assisted me to choose complementary examinations | 4 (3-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (3.75-4.25) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
It was helpful to decrease referral to specialists | 4 (2-4) | 4 (3-4) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (3-4) |
|
|
It was useful for different professional categories | 4 (3-4) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-4) |
|
|
I believe the recommendations are appropriate | 4 (3-4) | 4 (4-4) | 4 (3.75-4.25) | 4 (4-4) |
|
|
I used the suggestions to modify patient care | 4 (4-4) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
| Satisfaction, median (IQR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, I am satisfied with the application | 4 (4-4.75) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (3-4) |
|
|
It may be beneficial for patient care | 4 (4-4.75) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
I will keep using it for patient care | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
|
|
I would recommend this application | 4 (3-4.75) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) | 4 (4-5) |
aRanging from 1 to 5.
bCronbach α for the Global questionnaire (24 items) is .93.
cNASF-AB: Núcleo Ampliado de Saúde da Família e Atenção Básica (multidisciplinary primary care support teams).