Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;8(1):85–94. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13091

Table 4.

Goodness of fit (observed vs. predicted ischaemic stroke/TIA events) by number of risk points according to ordinal logistic model and Poisson, scaled by deviance

Score points Study population Observed events Predicted values
n (%) n (%) Logistic Poisson
0 707 (4.6) 3 (0.4) 7.0 (5.5–9.1) 6.2 (5.0–7.6)
1 1548 (10.0) 16 (1.0) 20.1 (16.3–24.7) 19.0 (16.0–22.4)
2 2008 (13.0) 35 (1.7) 34.0 (28.8–40.0) 33.5 (29.3–38.2)
3 2329 (15.1) 59 (2.5) 50.6 (44.7–57.4) 51.5 (46.5–57.0)
4 2625 (17.0) 77 (2.9) 73.7 (66.9–81.2) 76.0 (70.3–82.2)
5 2642 (17.1) 98 (3.7) 95.7 (87.5–104.7) 98.1 (91.3–105.5)
6 1881 (12.2) 87 (4.6) 87.4 (78.5–97.2) 87.2 (80.0–95.2)
≥7 1685 (10.9) 94 (5.6) 100.5 (87.5–115.3) 97.5 (87.0–109.4)
AUC 63.7 (61.4–66.1)
Wald χ 2 (global null hypothesis: β = 0) <0.0001 <0.0001
Lack of fit/test of the model form 0.4711 0.7062
Akaike information criterion 53.9 52.0

AUC, area under the curve.