TABLE 2.

Summary of outcomes of MRgFUS AF echo imaging technique.

Patient	Dx	Target	Volume	SDR	Sonication number	Energy delivered (KJ)	Tmax (°C)	AF sonication	AF power (W)	AF/CT similarity score	AF2/AF1 similarity score	Internal bubble score	Symptom	S/E
1	ET	VIM, Left	291	0.37	15	33	58	9	75	0.57	0.89	0.89	Improved	None
2	ET	VIM, Left	227	0.39	16	20	59	4	25	0.63	0.99	0.85	Improved	None
3	ET	VIM, Left	290.97	0.36	12	35	57	3	20	0.68	0.99	0.91	Improved	None
4	ET	VIM, Left	319.24	0.31	12	39	55	5	25	0.61	0.97	0.87	Improved	None
5	ET	VIM, Left	299.23	0.29	19	42	56	4	27	0.7	0.96	0.81	Improved	None
6	PD	GPi, Left	271	0.38	13	40	52	9	85	0.34	0.97	0.79	Improved	None
7	ET	VIM, Left	256	0.33	16	37	57	4	30	0.68	0.89	0.88	Improved	None
8	PD	GPi, Left	303.26	0.44	17	32	53	7	70	0.43	0.95	0.81	Improved	None
Average			282.21	0.36	15	34.75	55.88	5.63	44.63	0.58	0.95	0.85

Note. Dx, Diagnosis; ET, essential tremor; PD, Parkinson’s disease; VIM, Ventral intermediate nucleus; GPi, Globus pallidus interna; SDR, skull density ratio; AF, auto focusing echo imaging; Tmax, Maximal temperature; and S/E, side effect.