Skip to main content
letter
. 2020 Dec 6;22(1):217–219.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.007

Supplementary Table 2.

Changes in Functional Capacity and Strength in Response to the Training Interventions

Variable Group n Baseline [T0] vs. 4-week Training [T1]
4-week Training [T1] vs.14-week Training/Detraining [T2]
Change (95% CI) P Value ES Change (95% CI) P Value ES
SPPB (score) Confinement 12 2.3 (0.8 to 3.8) .006 0.71 −.91 (−.08 to −1.7) .034 0.24
Training 12 2.2 (3.3 to 1.1) .001 0.78 .74 (.13 to 1.4) .021 0.23
Timed Up-and-Go (s) Confinement 11 −8.6 (−1.6 to −15.5) .021 0.59 6.2 (−.93 to 13.3) .08 0.41
Training 11 −4.8 (−.21 to −9.5) .042 0.42 1.1 (−1.5 to 3.9) .36 0.13
Gait speed 6 m (m·s−1) Confinement 11 .21 (.11 to .32) .001 0.76 −.04 (−.14 to .05) .34 0.14
Training 11 .11 (.01 to .21) .023 0.60 .03 (−.05 to .12) .36 0.13
Sit-to-stand (s) Confinement 7 −7.0 (−3.6 to −10.4) .002 1.08 2.8 (−1.1 to 6.7) .13 0.45
Training 10 −4.2 (−1.4 to 7.1) .008 0.68 −2.4 (−5.1 to .01) .07 0.58
Sit-to-stand velocity (m·s−1) Confinement 6 .07 (.01 to .12) .019 0.43 −.02 (−.01 to .05) .44 0.18
Training 6 .05 (.01 to .11) .037 0.91 .04 (.01 to .06) .008 0.60
Handgrip strength (kg) Confinement 12 2.7 (1.4 to 4.0) .001 0.32 −.91 (−2.1 to .22) .10 0.11
Training 12 2.4 (.92 to 3.9) .005 0.38 −1.1 (−2.3 to .15) .08 0.17
Handgrip/BMI (kg·kg−1) Confinement 12 .03 (.01 to .05) .001 0.33 −.01 (−.01 to −.02) .13 0.10
Training 12 .04 (.01 to .06) .002 0.36 −.01 (−.01 to −.03) .13 0.12

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.

Significant differences (paired t-test P < .05).

Mean propulsive velocity measured with a linear transducer. From T0 to T1, both groups completed the same multicomponent exercise program; then, from T1 to T2 “Confinement” group interrupted the exercise program while “Training” maintained it.