Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Policy Mark. 2017 Sep 1;36(2):236–245. doi: 10.1509/jppm.16.013

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mediation analyses for attention to the risk text mediating the relationship between level of distractors and risk recognition, contraindication recognition, and risk recall. An indirect effect was considered statistically significant at the 0.05 level if the 95% confidence interval for the estimate did not contain zero. Values are calculated through a bootstrapping routine with 10,000 replications. (**p < .01, ***p < .001; CI: confidence interval; Contra.: contraindication; MW: MedWatch statement; a: Unstandardized coefficient of level of distractors [0 = low; 1 = high] on attention to the risk text; b: Unstandardized coefficient of attention to risk text on retention of risk information variable; c’: Unstandardized coefficient of level of distractors [0 = low; 1 = high] on retention of risk information variable; ab: Indirect effect).