Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;100(3):e22605. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022605

Table 1.

The basic characteristics of all included studies.

First author Year Country Study design Age Quality score Participants Cases (%) Noncases (%) Folate Categories (μg/d) RR (95% CI)
Chang et al 2007 United States Cohort <84 7 97,275 280 (0.29%) 96995 (99.71%) Total folate intake >711 vs ≤272 0.81(0.49–1.32)
Harris et al 2012 United States PBCC 54 ± 12 8 3899 1910 (48.99%) 1989 (51.01%) Dietary folate intakeTotal folate intake Q4 vs Q1Q4 vs. Q1 0.88(0.74–1.06)0.90(0.75–1.08)
Kelemen et al 2004 United States Cohort 55–69 7 27,205 147 (0.54%) 27058 (99.46%) Dietary folate intakeTotal folate intake ≥347 vs <238≥541 vs<257 1.45(0.83–2.53)1.73(0.90–3.33)
Kushi et al 1999 United States Cohort 55–69 6 29,083 139 (0.48%) 28944 (99.52%) Total folate intake >488.5 vs. <240.9 1.63(0.97–2.76)
Larsson et al. 2004 Sweden Cohort 38-76 7 61,084 266 (0.44%) 60818 (99.56%) Dietary folate intake ≥204 vs. <155 0.67(0.43–1.04)
McCann et al 2003 United States PBCC 40–85 7 820 124 (15.12%) 696 (84.88%) Dietary folate intake >425 vs <236 0.82(0.38–1.77)
Navarro Silvera et al 2006 Canada Cohort 40–59 8 49,613 264 (0.53%) 49349 (99.47%) Dietary folate intake >357 vs <248 0.78(0.44–1.40)
Pelucchi et al 2005 Italy HBCC NA 8 3442 1031 (29.95%) 2411 (70.05%) Dietary folate intake Q5 vs Q1 0.98(0.67–1.44)
Salazar-Martinez et al 2002 Mexico HBCC 20–79 7 713 84 (11.78%) 629 (88.22%) Dietary folate intake ≥322 vs ≤197 1.70(0.95–3.05)
Tworoger et al 2006 United States Cohort 30–55 8 80,254 481 (0.6%) 79773 (99.4%) Dietary folate intakeTotal folate intake Q5 vs Q1Q5 vs Q1 0.76(0.52–1.12)1.13(0.83–1.53)
Webb et al 2011 Australia PBCC 18–79 8 2777 1363 (49.08%) 1414 (50.92%) Dietary folate intakeTotal folate intake >366 vs <252>546 vs <334 1.0(0.8–1.24)1.05(0.84–1.30)
Zhang et al 2012 China HBCC 47.2 ± 7.5 8 433 215 (49.65%) 218 (50.35%) Dietary folate intake >310 vs <200 0.54(0.32–0.94)