Table 4.

Reviewer Checklist Example

Do I know my own common biases?

Have I addressed my biases by asking pertinent questions about my attitudes and opinions?

Have I considered the opposite of my first impression of the data?

Have I reviewed all relevant scientific data about this question?

Am I evaluating these data purely on their scientific merit? Important question Correct population to address question Valid statistical design highlighting adequate power to detect effect and a priori probability Standardized replicable methods with valid controls

Do I need further investigation of evidence to adequately address article significance and value of publication?

Is evidence supporting this observation skewed? If so, what is the evidence for the opposite conclusion?