Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 23;32(2):251–259. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05557-z

Table 3.

Proportion of patients at increased risk of fragility fracture and 10-year fracture probability, according to fracture risk criteria

Parameter n (%) 10-year fracture probability without BMD, median (Q1, Q3), %
Hip fracture Major osteoporotic fracture
Number of patients with increased risk of fragility fracture 2077 (100.0) 7.2 (4.1, 11.9) 16.6 (11.5, 23.9)
Meeting 1 of the 3 criteria
  Prior fracture only 168 (8.1) 4.4 (3.3, 5.6) 16.2 (12.7, 17.9)
  FRAX threshold only 733 (35.3) 11.5 (8.9, 15.8) 21.1 (17.6, 25.8)
  T-score onlya 83 (4.0) 5.8 (4.1, 7.7) 13.6 (11.0, 16.5)
Meeting 2 of the 3 criteria
  Prior fracture and FRAX threshold 858 (41.3) 12.3 (8.7, 17.4) 26.7 (21.9, 32.3)
  Prior fracture and T-score 12 (0.6) 5.4 (4.0, 5.9) 17.7 (16.4, 18.8)
  FRAX threshold and T-score 61 (2.9) 13.9 (11.8, 18.9) 23.2 (21.1, 27.6)
Meeting all 3 criteria 162 (7.8) 14.2 (10.7, 24.0) 30.6 (25.1, 39.1)

BMD, bone mineral density; FRAX, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; Q, quartile

aBMD results were only available in subset (24.9%) of the cohort

A patient was considered to be at increased risk of fragility fracture if ≥ 1 of the 3 following criteria were met: (1) had a history of fracture; (2) 10-year probability of hip fracture without BMD > country-specific threshold and 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture without BMD > country-specific threshold; (3) BMD T-score ≤ − 2.5 for any of lumbar spine/total hip/femoral neck

Groups are mutually exclusive (i.e., patients are only counted once with respect to how they met the criteria)

Percentages based on number of patients enrolled who are at increased risk of fragility fracture using the base definition