Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 26;11:2269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81871-8

Table 2.

Evolution of plasma glucose, NH4+ and bilirubin in BDL, BDL + probiotic, sham and sham + probiotic animals during disease progression.

BDL BDL + probiotic Sham Sham + probiotic p value
Plasma glucose (mg/dl)
Week 0 189 ± 6 193 ± 6 176 ± 19 192 ± 3 ns
Week 2 148 ± 11 154 ± 4 158 ± 4 171 ± 5 ns
Week 4 140 ± 5 134 ± 7 161 ± 4 169 ± 10 +
Week 6 111 ± 5 97 ± 8 156 ± 11 187 ± 24 *,+++
Week 8 92 ± 8 117 ± 7 200 ± 7 153 ± 11 ***
Plasma NH4+ (μM)
Week 0 61.2 ± 3.5 68.2 ± 8.5 68.9 ± 8.9 ns
Week 2 80.4 ± 5.5 93 ± 5.9 69.5 ± 11.3 ns
Week 4 106 ± 9.2 103.7 ± 10.9 50.9 ± 0.6 *
Week 6 126.4 ± 10.1 103.0 ± 8.1 60.6 ± 3.6 *
Week 8 152.9 ± 26.0 124.6 ± 17.1 53.9 ± 2.8 **,+
Plasma bilirubin (mg/dl)
Week 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 ns
Week 2 4.7 ± 0.2 5.8 ± 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 ns
Week 4 6.2 ± 0.3 6.6 ± 0.3 < 0.5 < 0.5 ns
Week 6 6.9 ± 0.5 7.1 ± 0.4 < 0.5 < 0.5 ns

Plasma NH4+ showed no difference between shams and shams + probiotic. Therefore, we pooled them together for the analysis. P value: for plasma glucose and plasma NH4+, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, *significance between BDL and sham groups, +significance between BDL + probiotic and sham groups. ns non-significant. For plasma bilirubin, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction statistics are shown between BDL and BDL + probiotic.