Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;15(1):66–79. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2021.15.1.66

Table 7. Food group intake pattern and DDS of the subjects.

GMVFD Gender Age group1)
Men (n = 720) Women (n = 1,585) P-value2) Young-aged (n = 277) Prime-aged (n = 261) Middle-aged (n = 605) Old-aged (n = 1,162) P-value2)
GMVFD pattern3) < 0.001 < 0.001
11110 186 (25.2) 494 (30.0) 62 (21.9) 72 (25.4) 211 (34.2) 335 (28.4)
11100 272 (36.0) 339 (20.6) 65 (25.9) 68 (26.3) 150 (26.1) 328 (28.2)
11111 95 (13.6) 346 (23.4) 67 (21.0) 56 (23.8) 126 (19.8) 192 (16.4)
11101 80 (13.2) 152 (11.5) 51 (18.7) 38 (15.2) 52 (9.6) 90 (8.6)
10100 34 (3.6) 68 (3.3) 3 (0.6) 8 (3.5) 18 (2.8) 73 (5.6)
10110 18 (2.3) 73 (3.9) 6 (2.1) 6 (1.7) 16 (2.2) 63 (5.4)
Others 35 (6.1) 113 (7.4) 23 (9.7) 12 (4.1) 32 (5.3) 81 (7.4)
DDS4) 3.56 ± 0.04 3.87 ± 0.03 < 0.001 3.66 ± 0.08 3.66 ± 0.06 3.83 ± 0.04 3.77 ± 0.04 0.124

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± SE. The data were analyzed by the Complex Samples module of SPSS software.

GMVFD, grain, meat, vegetable, fruit, and dairy product; DDS, dietary diversity score.

1)Young-aged = 20–34 years old, prime-aged = 35–49 years old, middle-aged = 50–64 years old, old-aged = 65 years old and more; 2)P-value by χ2 test; 3)Unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages are presented; 4)Values are in model 2 (adjusted for confounding variables).