TABLE 6.
Relative abundance of fungal taxa in the rhizosphere of lettuce (cv. Tizian) differing significantly (FDR < 0.05) in relative abundance depending on long-term organic vs. mineral fertilization practice at HUB-LTE (HU-org vs. HU-min) (A) and DOK-LTE (BIODYN2 vs. CONMIN) (B).
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | OTU | HU-org (%) | HU-min (%) |
| A. Fungal rhizosphere taxa differing significantly (FDR < 0.05) in relative abundance of lettuce grown in long-term organically vs. minerally fertilized soils from HUB-LTE | |||||||
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | 16.2 ± 1.6 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | ||||
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | 16.1 ± 1.6 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | |||
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Didymellaceae | 13.2 ± 1.5 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | ||
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Didymellaceae | Didymella | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Didymellaceae | Didymella | Didymella protuberans (100%) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0 ± 0 |
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Pleosporales | Didymellaceae | unidentified | Didymellaceae sp. | 11.3 ± 1.1 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
| Ascomycota | Orbiliomycetes | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 0.1 ± 0 | ||||
| Ascomycota | Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 0.1 ± 0 | |||
| Ascomycota | Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | ||
| Ascomycota | Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | Arthrobotrys | 1.8 ± 0.8 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | |
| Ascomycota | Orbiliomycetes | Orbiliales | Orbiliaceae | Arthrobotrys | Arthrobotrys oligospora (100%) | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 0.1 ± 0.1 |
| Ascomycota | Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Pezizaceae | 2.2 ± 2.1 | 0 ± 0 | ||
| Ascomycota | Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Pezizaceae | unidentified | Pezizaceae sp. | 2.2 ± 2.1 | 0 ± 0 |
| Basidiomycota | Agaricomycetes | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | ||||
| Basidiomycota | Ustilaginomycetes | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 0 ± 0 | ||||
| Basidiomycota | Ustilaginomycetes | Ustilaginales | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 0 ± 0 | |||
| Basidiomycota | Ustilaginomycetes | Ustilaginales | Ustilaginaceae | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 0 ± 0 | ||
| Basidiomycota | Ustilaginomycetes | Ustilaginales | Ustilaginaceae | Moesziomyces | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| Basidiomycota | Ustilaginomycetes | Ustilaginales | Ustilaginaceae | Moesziomyces | Moesziomyces aphidis (100%) | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Glomeromycota | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 0 ± 0 | |||||
| Glomeromycota | Glomeromycetes | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 0 ± 0 | ||||
| Glomeromycota | Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 0 ± 0 | |||
| Glomeromycota | Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | Glomeraceae | 1.0 ± 0.8 | 0 ± 0 | ||
| Olpidiomycota | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||||
| Olpidiomycota | Olpidiomycetes | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | ||||
| Olpidiomycota | Olpidiomycetes | Olpidiales | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||
| Olpidiomycota | Olpidiomycetes | Olpidiales | Olpidiaceae | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| Olpidiomycota | Olpidiomycetes | Olpidiales | Olpidiaceae | Olpidium | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |
| Olpidiomycota | Olpidiomycetes | Olpidiales | Olpidiaceae | Olpidium | Olpidium brassicae (99.7%) | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
| – | − | − | − | unidentified | 24.3 ± 1.5 | 6.9 ± 1.3 | |
| Ascomycota | Pezizomycetes | Pezizales | Ascobolaceae | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 1.5 | ||
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Lasiosphaeriaceae | Podospora | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | Lasiosphaeriaceae | Podospora | Podospora sp. | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.0 ± 0.5 |
| Basidiomycota | Tremellomycetes | Tremellales | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | |||
| Mortierellomycota | 20.0 ± 3.1 | 47.8 ± 5.0 | |||||
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | 20.0 ± 3.1 | 47.8 ± 5.0 | ||||
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | 20.0 ± 3.1 | 47.8 ± 5.0 | |||
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | 20.0 ± 3.1 | 47.6 ± 5.0 | ||
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | 20.0 ± 3.1 | 47.6 ± 5.0 | |
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | Mortierella humilis (100%) | 0 ± 0 | 1.7 ± 0.6 |
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | Mortierella hyalina (100%) | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 8.3 ± 4.0 |
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | Mortierella sp. | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 1.1 |
| Mucoromycota | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | |||||
| Mucoromycota | Mucoromycetes | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | ||||
| Mucoromycota | Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | |||
| Mucoromycota | Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Rhizopodaceae | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | ||
| Mucoromycota | Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Rhizopodaceae | Rhizopus | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | |
| Mucoromycota | Mucoromycetes | Mucorales | Rhizopodaceae | Rhizopus | Rhizopus arrhizus (100%) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.3 |
| Mucoromycota | Umbelopsidomycetes | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | ||||
| Mucoromycota | Umbelopsidomycetes | Umbelopsidales | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | |||
| Mucoromycota | Umbelopsidomycetes | Umbelopsidales | Umbelopsidaceae | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | ||
| Mucoromycota | Umbelopsidomycetes | Umbelopsidales | Umbelopsidaceae | Umbelopsis | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | |
| Mucoromycota | Umbelopsidomycetes | Umbelopsidales | Umbelopsidaceae | Umbelopsis | Umbelopsis sp. | 0.2 ± 0 | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | OTU | BIODYN2 (%) | CONMIN (%) |
| B. Fungal rhizosphere taxa differing significantly (FDR < 0.05) in relative abundance of lettuce grown in long-term organically vs. minerally fertilized soils from DOK-LTE | |||||||
| Glomeromycota | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 0.2 ± 0 | |||||
| Glomeromycota | Glomeromycetes | Glomerales | 1.4 ± 0.9 | 0.1 ± 0 | |||
| Basidiomycota | Tremellomycetes | Filobasidiales | Piskurozymaceae | 0.1 ± 0 | 1.7 ± 1.0 | ||
| Mortierellomycota | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 17.3 ± 11.0 | |||||
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 17.3 ± 11.0 | ||
| Mortierellomycota | Mortierellomycetes | Mortierellales | Mortierellaceae | Mortierella | Mortierella elongata (100%) | 0.2 ± 0 | 7.2 ± 5.7 |
Only taxa with >1.0% relative abundance are displayed. For OTUs at species level, the percentages of similarity compared to the database are specified. Data represent means of relative abundance ± standard errors. Bold numbers indicate significant enrichment.