Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):373ā€“381. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.25071

Table 4. Temporal Trends of Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack.

Time horizon for stroke risk Total No. of events Epoch 1 (1948-1985) Epoch 2 (1986-1999) Epoch 3 (2000-2017) P value for trend
90 d
No. of events, No./total 51/435 26/155 18/162 7/118
Proportion of cases with subsequent stroke, % 11.7 16.7 11.1 5.9
Hazard ratio (95% CI)a,b 1 [Reference] 0.60 (0.33-1.12) 0.32 (0.14-0.75) .005
1 y
No. of events, No./total 67/435 37/155 21/162 9/118
Proportion of cases with subsequent stroke, % 15.4 23.9 12.9 7.6
Hazard ratio (95% CI)a,b 1 [Reference] 0.49 (0.28-0.84) 0.29 (0.14-0.60) <.001
5 y
No. of events, No./total 107/435 55/155 33/162 19/118
Proportion of cases with subsequent stroke, % 24.6 35.5 20.4 16.1
Hazard ratio (95% CI)a,b 1 [Reference] 0.48 (0.31-0.74) 0.37 (0.22-0.63) <.001
10 y
No. of events, No./total 130/435 64/155 42/162 24/118
Proportion of cases with subsequent stroke, % 29.9 41.3 25.9 20.3
Duration of follow up, median (range)c 6.49 (0.74-10) 6.85 (1.88-10) 5.39 (2.19-8.62)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)a,b 1 [Reference] 0.52 (0.35-0.78) 0.43 (0.27-0.69) <.001
a

Each row represents a separate Cox regression analysis with a different time horizon; hence, the number at risk (nā€‰=ā€‰435) is the same in all analyses.

b

Age- and sex-adjusted.

c

Only median duration of follow-up for the 10-year time horizon is reported. In all other time strata (90 days, 1 year, 5 years), all participants have complete follow-up and the median follow-up time coincides with the maximum duration of these time windows.