Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;63(6):1776–1792. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00228

Table 3.

Results of the generalized linear regression model testing the relationship between profile group and mean frequency of vocalizations.

Modes Coefficients
Estimate SE t Significance code F p
Vocalizations
 Groups 19.4 < .0001
  SMI-LCI vs. ANAR 52.6 6.55 8.04 *** < .0001
  SMI-LCT vs. ANAR 47.57 7.66 6.21 *** < .0001
  SMI-LCT vs. SMI-LCI –5.03 9.15 –0.55 .59
Vocalizations + gestures
 Groups 12.4 < .0001
  SMI-LCI vs. ANAR 4.93 1.7 2.91 ** .0061
  SMI-LCT vs. ANAR 2.33 1.01 2.31 * .0265
  SMI-LCT vs. SMI-LCI –2.6 1.97 –1.32 .2004
Gestures
 Groups 3.35 .0458
  SMI-LCI vs. ANAR 1.93 0.97 2 .053
  SMI-LCT vs. ANAR –0.5 0.71 –0.71 .484
  SMI-LCT vs. SMI-LCI –2.43 0.88 –2.75 * .0113

Note. SMI-LCI = children with speech motor impairment and language comprehension impairment; ANAR = children who have anarthria and are unable to speak; SMI-LCT = children with speech motor impairment and typical language comprehension. Degrees of freedom: ANAR as the reference group: 2, 37; SMI-LCI as the reference group: 1, 23.

Significance codes: *0.01; **0.001; ***0.