Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 22;4:38. doi: 10.18332/ejm/126626

Table 3.

Comparing counsellors’ knowledge (≥75% correct answers) on different subcategories at T0, for counsellors with and without ultrasonography (USG) experience

Questionnaire subcategories (number of questions) Total number of participants (N=377) n (%) Participants with USG experience(N=104) n (%) Participants without USG experience(N=273) n (%) pa
FAS (n=12) 161 (43) 48 (46) 113 (41) 0.40
CT (n=12) 306 (81) 98 (94) 208 (76) <0.001
NIPT (n=11) 299 (79) 90 (87) 209 (77) 0.03
Aneuploidies 244 (65) 83 (80) 161 (59) <0.001
Trisomy 21 (n=12) 203 (54) 72 (69) 131 (48) <0.001
Trisomy 13 (n=2) 304 (81) 89 (86) 215 (79) 0.13
Trisomy 18 (n=3) 295 (78) 86 (83) 209 (77) 0.20
Structural anomalies 250 (66) 76 (73) 174 (64) 0.09
Spina bifida (n=2) 292 (78) 88 (85) 204 (75) 0.04
Congenital heart disease (n=4) 103 (27) 27 (26) 76 (28) 0.72
a

Difference between practitioners with and without ultrasonography experience with significance at p<0.01.

FAS: foetal anomaly scan. CT: combined test. NIPT: noninvasive prenatal test. USG: ultrasonography.