Table 5.
Predominant dietary patternsd | ORs with 95% CIs/Variance with 95% CIs | Robust SEs | Z values | P values |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed parts | ||||
“Sugar-sweetened beverage and snack” pattern | ||||
Model 1 | 1.76 (1.21, 2.58) | 0.34 | 2.934 | 0.003 |
Model 2 | 1.67 (1.15, 2.43) | 0.32 | 2.689 | 0.007 |
Model 3 | 1.66 (1.14, 2.42) | 0.32 | 2.662 | 0.008 |
Model 4 | 1.61 (1.09, 2.38) | 0.32 | 2.385 | 0.017 |
“Health conscious” pattern | ||||
Model 1 | 1.00 (0.70, 1.43) | 0.18 | −0.014 | 0.988 |
Model 2 | 1.04 (0.72, 1.51) | 0.20 | 0.226 | 0.821 |
Model 3 | 1.05 (0.73, 1.51) | 0.20 | 0.247 | 0.805 |
Model 4 | 1.13 (0.78, 1.65) | 0.22 | 0.646 | 0.518 |
“Snack” pattern | ||||
Model 1 | 1.16 (0.82, 1.63) | 0.20 | 0.838 | 0.402 |
Model 2 | 1.22 (0.86, 1.72) | 0.22 | 1.102 | 0.271 |
Model 3 | 1.17 (0.83, 1.65) | 0.20 | 0.921 | 0.357 |
Model 4 | 1.13 (0.79, 1.61) | 0.20 | 0.680 | 0.497 |
Random parts | ||||
Intercepts at class level | ||||
Model 1 | 0.35 (0.18, 0.67) | 0.12 | ||
Model 2 | 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) | 0.00 | ||
Model 3 | 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) | 0.00 | ||
Model 4 | 0.02 (0.00, 487.47) | 0.08 |
Abbreviations: OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; SE: standard error
Notes: aDependent variable: overweight/obesity; bModel 1 only included predominant dietary patterns; model 2 included adjustment for children’s age and gender; model 3 included further adjustment for children’s daily average time of moderate-to-vigorous physical activities and daily average sedentary time, on weekdays and weekends respectively; model 4 included further adjustment for parents’ socioeconomic status scores and body mass index; cData imputation was applied by using modes to replace missing data in children’s daily average time of moderate-to-vigorous physical activities and daily average sedentary time, and medians in parents’ socioeconomic status scores and body mass index; dReference: the “Chinese traditional” pattern