Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;28(4):2423–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.040

Table 3.

Binding affinities of the selected compounds in 10 different runs of AutoDock Vina with independent random seeds. R1, R2, R3, …., R10 shows replicates of AutoDock Vina run.

S. No. Compound ID Affinity (kcal/mol)
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 Mean
1 ZINC02161101 −9.8 −9.4 −8.9 −9.4 −9.9 −9.8 −9.4 −9.5 −9.9 −9.4 −9.5
2 ZINC02113993 −9.8 −9.8 −9.8 −9.2 −9.8 −9.9 −8.9 −8.7 −8.8 −9.5 −9.4
3 ZINC02123811 −9.7 −9.8 −9.6 −9.6 −9.7 −9.4 −9.6 −9.7 −9.7 −9.7 −9.6
4 ZINC02125386 −9.6 −9.6 −8.4 −9.5 −8.2 −9.6 −9.6 −9.6 −9.6 −9.7 −9.3
5 ZINC02113878 −9.6 −9.5 −9.6 −9.6 −9.6 −9.5 −9.6 −9.6 −9.5 −9.5 −9.6
6 ZINC02110106 −9.5 −8.9 −9.5 −9.5 −9.5 −9.4 −9.5 −9.4 −9.5 −9.5 −9.4
7 ZINC02123668 −9.5 −8.6 −9.5 −9.5 −9.4 −9.5 −8.5 −9.5 −9.5 −9.5 −9.3
8 ZINC02128147 −9.5 −9.5 −9.5 −8.2 −9.5 −9.5 −9.6 −9.5 −9.5 −8.9 −9.3
9 ZINC02111094 −9.4 −9.1 −9.4 −9.2 −9.3 −9.1 −9.3 −9.4 −9.4 −9.1 −9.3
10 ZINC02112091 −9.4 −9.1 −8.4 −9.4 −8.4 −9.3 −9.4 −8.2 −9.5 −8.4 −9.0