Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;72(2):222–229. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa019

Table 3.

Adjusted Hazard Ratios Denoting Homotypic and Heterotypic Protection or Cross-reactivity Between Norovirus Genotypes Among 194 Children in Peru

Prior Infection Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
GI.3 (n = 73) GI.5 (n = 51) GI.7 (n = 58) GII.2 (n = 45) GII.4 (n = 195) GII.6 (n = 150) GII.17 (n = 53) GII.23 (n = 49)
GI.3 0.35  a  (.15–.82) 0.64 (.28–1.48) 0.60 (.27–1.34) 0.89 (.37–2.37) 1.57a (1.08–2.28) 1.75b,c (1.18–2.59) 0.73 (.32–1.67) 0.18 (.03–1.23)
GI.5 1.47 (.80–2.71) 0.89 (.31–2.51) 0.89 (.44–1.82) 0.67 (.22–2.07) 1.17 (.76–1.80) 0.81 (.42–1.57) 1.29 (.66–2.53) 1.30 (.42–4.07)
GI.7 1.17 (.72–1.90) 0.90 (.44–1.81) 0.19  a  (.04–.79) 0.85 (.33–2.33) 1.10 (.76–1.60) 1.06 (.71–1.57) 0.94 (.44–2.00) 1.09 (.48–2.48)
GII.2 1.36 (.79–2.33) 0.27 (.07–1.07) 0.53 (.21–1.29) 0.74 (.30–1.86) 1.16 (.78–1.72) 1.33 (.88–2.01) 3.42b,c (2.00–5.82) 1.05 (.44–2.51)
GII.4 0.52b,c (.33–.82) 1.03 (.52–2.03) 0.74 (.44–1.24) 0.41a (.20–.84) 0.39  b,c  (.27–.54) 0.91 (.66–1.27) 0.79 (.43–1.45) 1.13 (.67–1.92)
GII.6 1.09 (.71–1.70) 1.18 (.64–2.18) 0.73 (.43–1.26) 1.61 (.84–3.09) 0.96 (.70–1.33) 0.52  b,c  (.32–.82) 1.73a (1.03–2.91) 2.19a (1.19–4.03)
GII.17 2.06b,c (1.29–3.30) 0.61 (.17–1.23) 0.77 (.39–1.52) 0.94 (.39–1.26) 0.71 (.43–1.17) 1.06 (.69–1.61) 0.38 (.12–1.20) 0.91 (.32–2.58)
GII.23 0.76 (.41–1.41) 1.22 (.61–2.44) 0.72 (.32–1.62) 0.43 (.14–1.29) 0.83 (.54–1.27) 1.03 (.72–1.47) 0.90 (.42–1.95) 1.14 (.49–2.65)

Hazard ratios of being infected with the same genotype (highlighted with bold text) or a different genotype among children with vs without prior infection with genotypes are listed in the left-hand column. Values between 0 and 1 denote reduced risk of subsequent infection among the previously exposed; values > 1 denote increased risk of subsequent infection among the previously exposed. Hazard ratios included adjustment for length-for-age z score and the duration of exclusive breastfeeding.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

a  P < .05 (significantly different from the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between prior and future infection).

b  P < .01 (strong significant finding).

cHolds after Holm correction (P < .007).