Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;120(2):189–204. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.12.002

Table 1.

Calmodulin Prediction Comparison to Phenotype Prediction Software


MDPPM
PON-P
CONDEL
predictSNP
Variant Phenotype Prediction PON-P SIFT PPH2 MA FATHMM CONDEL predictSNP PhD-SNP PolyPhen-1 PolyPhen-2 SIFT SNAP
A21G AD1b 0.845a 0.420d 0.978b 0.805b −4.910d 0.561b 75%d 83%d 67%d 61%d 76%d 56%b
A42T AD1b 0.949b 0.000b 1.000b 1.040b −4.910d 0.570b 60%d 51%d 67%d 68%d 53%b 81%b
D7N AD1b 0.950b 1.000d 0.336c 0.345d −4.090d 0.519d 72%b 55%d 59%b 63%b 79%b 85%b
E22G AD1b 0.937b 0.010b 0.912b 0.975b −4.930d 0.568b 51%b 61%b 67%d 41%b 53%d 72%b
D23N CAAb 0.791a 0.230d 0.984b 0.975b −5.110d 0.573b 87%b 59%b 74%b 60%b 53%b 81%b
E22K CAAb 0.895b 0.010b 0.460c 0.625d −4.910d 0.552b 87%b 61%b 59%b 60%b 45%b 89%b
E22Q CAAb 0.956b 0.010b 0.936b 0.975b −4.920d 0.568b 61%b 51%d 67%d 81%b 79%b 89%b
L34V CAAb 0.885b 0.000b 0.999b 1.040b −4.990d 0.572b 76%b 51%d 74%b 68%b 79%b 62%b
E3D WTd 0.861b 0.150d 0.015d 0.975b −4.870d 0.566b 71%d 72%d 67%d 68%d 79%b 58%d
E22D WTd 0.938b 0.150d 0.015d 0.975b −4.870d 0.566b 75%d 66%d 67%d 63%d 67%d 56%b
Pearson −0.726 0.395 0.268 −0.258 −0.267 0.448 −0.362 0.007 −0.380 −0.123 0.673 0.823 0.067
Accuracy 100.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 60.0% 0.0% 70.0% 60.0% 30.0% 40.0% 60.0% 60.0% 80.0%
a

Unknown.

b

Deleterious/pathological.

c

Possible damage.

d

Neutral/nonpathological.