Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 14;11:622209. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.622209

TABLE 7.

Cost estimates on labor operations (Kurtural et al., 2020) and water footprint (Zotou and Tsihrintzis, 2017) of Merlot/3309C grapevines subjected to different irrigation amount (FI, full irrigated; HI, half irrigated), AMF inoculation (I, inoculated; NI, non-inoculated), and their combinations during the 2020 growing season (first productive year) in Oakville (California).

Labor operation cost AMF inoculation ($/Ha) Irrigation ($/Ha) Total ($/Ha) Yield (kg/Ha) Gross income ($/Ha)
Treatment
FINI 0 529.25 529.25 528.3 a ± 50.0 264.5 ± 30.6
FII 15 529.25 544.25 428.3 b ± 50.0 104.5 ± 47.1
HINI 0 363.86 363.86 410.0 b ± 16.7 251.1 ± 30.2
HII 15 363.86 378.86 348.3 c ± 33.3 127.4 ± 22.5
LMEM
Irrigation amount (I) * ns
AMF inoculation (M) ns ns
I × M ns ns
Water footprint (WF) Green WF (m3/ton) Blue WF (m3/ton) Gray WF (m3/ton) Total WF (m3/ton)
Treatment
FINI 1061.7 c ± 121.5 1706.1 b ± 195.3 ND 2767.8 b ± 316.8
FII 1331.3 ab ± 180.9 2139.2 a ± 290.7 ND 3470.5 a ± 471.5
HINI 1326.7 b ± 65.2 1065.8 d ± 52.4 ND 2392.5 c ± 117.6
HII 1597.7 a ± 152.5 1283.6 c ± 122.5 ND 2881.3 b ± 275.0
LMEM
Irrigation amount (I) * ***
AMF inoculation (M) ns ns ns
I × M ns ns ns

Values represent means ± SE (n = 4) separated by Kenward–Roger method and Tukey’s p-value adjustment (P ≤ 0.05). Different letters within column, indicate significant differences as affected by Irrigation amount, I, AMF inoculation, M, and their interaction (I × M). ns, indicate non-significance, * and *** indicate non-significance or significance at 10, 5, and 0.1% probability levels, respectively. All values are expressed as mg of the compound per gram of skin dry weight. LMEM, linear mixed-effect model; ND, not determined.