Table 3.
Model results: sexual harassment perpetration | ||||||||||
Unconstrained | Constrained | Difference | ||||||||
Chi-square | df | RMSEA | SRMR | Chi-square | df | RMSEA | SRMR | Chi-square | df | p value |
0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 55.86 | 44 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 55.86 | 44 | 0.108 |
Rank | Mean | Wald | p value | |||||||
1 | 1.34 | 1 v 2 | −6.72 | 0.000 | ||||||
2 | 3.05 | 2 v 3 | −5.46 | 0.000 | ||||||
3 | 4.02 | 3 v 4 | −5.16 | 0.000 | ||||||
4 | 4.96 | |||||||||
Model-estimated means: sexual harassment perpetration | ||||||||||
N | Fall 6th | Spring 6th | Fall 7th | Spring 7th | Fall 8th | Spring 8th | ||||
SC Females—Cohort 3 | 428 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
SC Males—Cohort 3 | 401 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
DM Females—Cohort 3 | 444 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
DM Males—Cohort 3 | 399 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
SC Females—Cohort 4 | 418 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
SC Males—Cohort 4 | 392 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 3.05 | 4.96 | 4.96 | |||
DM Females—Cohort 4 | 460 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.02 | 3.05 | 4.02 | 4.02 | |||
DM Males—Cohort 4 | 359 | 1.34 | 4.96 | 4.96 | 3.05 | 4.96 | 4.96 |
Note. SC standard-of-care condition, DM Dating Matters condition