Table 4.

Model results and model-estimated means for sexual harassment victimization

Model results: sexual harassment victimization
Unconstrained				Constrained				Difference
Chi-square	df	RMSEA	SRMR	Chi-square	df	RMSEA	SRMR	Chi-square	df	p value
0.00	0	0.00	0.00	22.65	43	0.00	0.02	22.65	43	0.995
		Rank	Mean			Wald	p value
		1	7.04		1 v 2	−2.70	0.007
		2	8.10		2 v 3	−2.52	0.012
		3	8.89		3 v 4	−5.03	0.000
		4	9.94		4 v 5	−2.66	0.008
		5	10.73
Model-estimated means: sexual harassment victimization
	N	Fall 6th	Spring 6th	Fall 7th	Spring 7th	Fall 8th	Spring 8th
SC Females—Cohort 3	428	7.04	9.94	10.73	9.94	9.94	10.73
SC Males—Cohort 3	401	8.89	9.94	10.73	8.89	9.94	9.94
DM Females—Cohort 3	444	7.04	8.10	8.89	8.10	8.89	8.10
DM Males—Cohort 3	399	8.89	9.94	10.73	8.10	9.94	8.89
SC Females—Cohort 4	418	7.04	8.89	9.94	8.89	8.89	9.94
SC Males—Cohort 4	392	8.89	9.94	10.73	8.89	8.89	9.94
DM Females—Cohort 4	460	7.04	8.89	9.94	7.04	8.89	8.89
DM Males—Cohort 4	359	8.89	8.89	10.73	8.89	8.89	8.89

Note. SC standard-of-care condition, DM Dating Matters condition