Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;12:636. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20608-z

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics.

EMDB
PDB ID
UTP-bound
wt-Nsp15
22610
7K0R
wt-Nsp15
22611
Nsp15 H235A dataset i
22613
Nsp15 H235A dataset ii
22612
Data collection and processing
 Magnification 36,000 36,000 45,000 45,000
 Voltage (kV) 200 200 200 200
 Electron exposure (e2) ~54 ~54 ~54 ~54
 Defocus range (μm) −1.0 to −2.5 −1.0 to −2.5 −1.0 to −2.5 −1.0 to −2.5
 Pixel size (Å) 1.187 1.187 0.932 0.932
 Scaled pixel size (Å) 1.145 1.145 0.8991 0.8991
 Symmetry imposed D3 D3 D3 D3
 Initial particle images (no.) 383,271 672,879 382,348 641,748
 Final particle images (no.) 65,393 167,106 59,703 433,403
 Map resolution (Å) (FSC = 0.143) 3.38 3.02 3.37 2.94
 Map resolution (Å) (FSC = 0.5) 3.62 3.34 3.59 3.04
 Map resolution range (Å) 3.3 to 6.2 2.6 to 4.9 2.8 to 6.0 2.3 to 5.8
Refinement
Model composition
 Nonhydrogen atoms 16,038
 Protein residues 2070
 Ligands 12
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 99.24
 Ligand 131.77
Map-model CC
 CC (mask) 0.8335
 CC (volume) 0.8287
 CC (peaks) 0.7920
 CC (box) 0.8794
R.M.S. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.009
 Bond angles (°) 0.767
Validation
 Molprobity score 1.23
 Clashscore 3.56
 Poor rotamers (%) 1.05
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 97.67
 Allowed (%) 2.33
 Disallowed (%) 0