Table 5.

Characteristics of 11 Patients With Arthrofibrosis Treated Operatively for Type 2 Tibial Spine Fractures (2000-2019)^a

No.	Sex	Age, y	Extension Deficit and/or >25° of Flexion Lost	ROM Before Treatment, degb	Treatment	ROM at Final Visit, degb
1	Female	10	Unknown	NR	LOA, MUA	125, 5, 120
2	Female	8	Extension deficit	140, 2, 138	LOA, ROH	140, 0, 140
3	Female	8	Extension deficit	NR	None	140, 5, 135
4	Male	12	Extension deficit	145, 10, 135	LOA, MUA	135, 10, 125
5	Female	11	Both	NR	None	60, 10, 50
6	Female	10	Extension deficit	NR	None	135, 5, 130
7	Male	12	Unknown	NR	LOA, MUA, ROH	NR
8	Male	13	Unknown	NR	MUA	145, 0, 145
9	Female	10	Both	100, 5, 95	ROH	140, 0, 140
10	Female	14	Unknown	NR	LOA, MUA	NR
11	Male	11	Both	85, 5, 80	None	95, 0, 95

^aLOA, lysis of adhesions; MUA, manipulation under anesthesia; NR, not recorded; ROH, removal of hardware; ROM, range of motion.

^bROM expressed as flexion, extension, total arc of motion.