Table 7.

Logistic regressions on being malnourished with background variables

Logistic regression model	Type of intervention and conditions†			Adjusted	95% CI	P value
	Nutrition specific	Nutrition sensitive	Enabling environment	OR
Logistic regression for stunting
v1: sex (dummy variable for ‘male’)	–	–	X	1.482	0.573 to 3.830	0.417
v17: ownership of refrigerator	–	X	X	0	0	0.999
v25: age (year)	–	–	X	6.617	0.017 to 2550.7	0.534
v32: availability and consumption of fruits (vitamin A rich and other fruits)	–	X	–	1.001	0.198 to 5.055	0.999
v79: introduction of solid, semi-solid and/or soft foods	X	–	–	0.317	0.124 to 0.812	0.017 *
Logistic regression for underweight
v84: mother–child cosleeping	X	X	–	0.333	0.212 to 0.524	<0.001 **
v92: ownership of birth certificate	X	–	–	1.656	1.057 to 2.596	0.028 *
Logistic regression for wasting
v34: availability and consumption of eggs	–	X	–	0.184	0.045 to 0.754	0.019 *
v86: delivery not attended by health workers	X	–	–	1.45	0.330 to 6.383	0.623
v106: cough during the last 2 weeks	X	–	–	1.713	1.128 to 2.603	0.012 *

*p<0.05, **p<0.01.

†Categorisation based on the previous review (Black et al. 2013).¹⁵