Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;6(3):2396–2409. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05863

Table 2. Model Constants for the Skewed and Gaussian Models of Control (A) and Limited Irrigation (B) with Foliar Application of PSAP in Sugarcane Plantsa.

(A)
    control (95–90% of FC)
    Skewed model
Gaussian model
photosynthetic responses PSAP (M) α β γ a b c
PN 0 21.60 83.27 17.58 21.97 1.71 3.99
  2 21.97 1634.09 15.78 22.33 1.91 4.14
  4 24.14 104.69 11.92 24.22 1.46 5.05
  6 28.80 14.24 47.96 29.32 0.73 5.67
  10 28.89 34.65 92.81 29.49 0.017 6.27
gs 0 146.38 107.68 5.98 158.13 –1.79 6.43
  2 205.52 156.24 2.71 306.89 –4.09 17.33
  4 259.95 151.97 2.33 199.51 –95.63 25.83
  6 245.28 603.60 2.88 100.48 –109.31 26.79
  10 295.67 722.28 2.12 233.27 –35.47 2.07
E 0 1.98 1.48 18.94 2.03 0.47 4.60
  2 2.04 2.46 14.33 2.07 0.95 4.02
  4 2.27 47.36 8.54 2.27 0.69 4.59
  6 2.90 2.84 10.32 3.04 –0.14 4.55
  10 2.86 7.19 5.74 3.06 –0.89 5.06
(B)
    drought (45–40% of FC)
    Skewed model
Gaussian model
photosynthetic responses PSAP (M) α β γ a b c
PN 0 13.38 5.38 258.18 14.81 –1.41 6.69
  2 15.77 8.39 42.42 17.13 –0.86 5.84
  4 17.57 17.18 7.81 19.18 –1.32 5.96
  6 20.08 22.94 7.37 21.66 –1.05 5.67
  10 20.32 62.38 5.39 22.78 –2.17 6.35
gs 0 91.27 60.04 43.07 92.95 7.28 4.16
  2 97.25 64.25 59.28 98.23 1.26 3.99
  4 123.37 194.81 9.14 124.71 0.63 4.03
  6 128.98 142.99 17.43 130.95 0.99 4.09
  10 129.27 273.39 8.52 130.61 0.62 4.32
E 0 1.13 0.83 5.76 1.39 –6.78 12.41
  2 1.21 2.58 6.07 1.301 –2.84 10.14
  4 1.22 0.81 41.47 1.24 1.69 5.24
  6 1.45 10.42 7.30 1.49 –0.34 6.45
  10 1.28 30.83 11.15 1.30 0.75 6.30
a

PN = photosynthesis, gs = stomatal conductance to water vapor, and E = transpiration rate.