Table 2.
TIDieR criteria evaluation.
Criteria | Berger et al. (2018) | Carroll et al. (2015) | McClain et al. (2018) | Nuño et al. (2019) | Soltani et al. (2018) | Ye et al. (2017) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provided the name or a phrase that describes the intervention | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Described any rationale, theory, or goal of the elements essential to the intervention | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Gave details on materials and information on where the materials can be accessed (for example, online appendix, URL) | X | X | X | X | ||
Gave details on procedures used in the intervention | X | X | X | X | X | |
Provided details on intervention team members | X | X | X | X | ||
Provided details on mode of delivery such as face to face or by some other mechanism, and whether it was provided individually or in a group | X | X | X | X | X | |
Provided details on intervention location including any necessary infrastructure or relevant features | X | X | X | X | X | |
Described the schedule, duration, intensity or dose | X | X | X | X | X | |
Explained if the intervention was planned to be personalized, titrated or adapted | X | X | ||||
Explained if the intervention was modified during the course of the study | ||||||
Explained how intervention adherence or fidelity was assessed | ||||||
IF intervention adherence or fidelity was assessed, describe the extent to which the intervention was delivered as planned |