Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;19(1):e06378. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6378

Table 3.

Summary of the temperature of Nile perch fillets before and after the superchilling process at the origin (African supplier) and at arrival to the destination (European establishment)

Company/Supplier of superchilled Nile perch fillets
1 2 3 4 5 all
Start fish temperature (before superchilling)
Mean* 1.9c 3.6a 2.0b 1.7c 0.3d 2.6
SD 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 1.0
max 2.9 4.8 3.6 2.0 0.7 4.8
P95 2.6 4.3 3.1 2.0 0.6 4.1
P90 2.4 4.1 2.7 1.9 0.5 3.8
P75 2.2 3.8 2.2 1.8 0.4 3.5
P50 1.9 3.6 2.0 1.8 0.2 2.4
P25 1.7 3.3 1.8 1.7 0.1 1.9
min 1.0 2.5 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.0
(# samples) (n = 290) (n = 430) (n = 177) (n = 28) (n = 43) (n = 968)
Superchilled fish temperature (after superchilling)
Mean* –1.1b –1.6d –1.2c –0.9a –1.6d –1.3
SD 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3
max –0.6 –0.8 –0.9 –0.7 –1.4 –0.6
P95 –0.6 –1.2 –1.0 –0.7 –1.4 –0.8
P90 –0.8 –1.3 –1.1 –0.8 –1.5 –1.0
P75 –1.0 –1.4 –1.2 –0.9 –1.5 –1.1
P50 –1.1 –1.6 –1.2 –0.9 –1.6 –1.4
P25 –1.2 –1.7 –1.3 –1.0 –1.7 –1.6
min –2.4 –2.1 –1.8 –1.1 –2.0 –2.4
(# samples) (n = 290) (n = 430) (n = 177) (n = 28) (n = 43) (n = 968)
Fish temperature at the end of transport/storage (at arrival to the EU establishment)
Mean* –0.7 –0.7 –0.7 –0.7 –0.7 –0.7
SD 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
max 1.2 2.4 0.7 1.4 0.9 2.4
P95 0.3 0.4 –0.2 –0.1 0.4 0.3
P90 –0.3 –0.2 –0.5 –0.3 –0.3 –0.3
P75 –0.5 –0.6 –0.6 –0.5 –0.6 –0.6
P50 –0.8 –0.8 –0.8 –0.8 –0.8 –0.8
P25 –1.0 –1.0 –0.9 –0.9 –0.9 –1.0
min –1.6 –1.5 –1.4 –1.6 –1.6 –1.6
(# samples) (n = 135) (n = 91) (n = 52) (n = 137) (n = 59) (n = 474)

SD: standard deviation; P: percentile.

*

Superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences among mean values (Tukey HSD comparisons).

Note: Data reported in the ‘Nile perch study’ were obtained from the self‐monitoring programme of five companies.