Table 1.
Model | AIC | BIC | Log likelihood | χ2 | χ2 difference | df | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | 1,469.6 | 1,503.7 | −727.80 | 1,455.6 | |||
Model 2 | 1,463.5 | 1,502.4 | −723.73 | 1,447.5 | 8.1410 | 1 | .004 |
Model 3 | 1,464.0 | 1,507.8 | −723.01 | 1,446.0 | 1.4440 | 1 | .229 |
Model 4 | 1,467.4 | 1,520.9 | −722.68 | 1,445.4 | 0.6593 | 2 | .719 |
Note. Model 1 included main effects for condition, stimuli organization, and stimuli modality. Model 2 included a two-way interaction term for condition and organization. Model 3 included a two-way interaction term for condition and organization and a two-way interaction term for condition and modality as well as a three-way interaction term for condition, organization, and modality. Bold text represents the best-fitting model based on likelihood ratio tests. AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion.