Skip to main content
. 2020 May 13;63(5):1509–1520. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00281

Table 2.

Zero-order fixed effects estimates for vocal variables predicting end point expressive language.

Construct Vocal variable Coeff. SE t df p Pseudo R 2
Quantity Number of total vocalizations HC 0.26 0.07 3.74 89 < .001 .16
AQV A 2.9 × 104 6.8 × 105 4.35 84 < .001 .19
Communicative quality Number of communication acts with a vocalization HC 0.86 0.10 8.64 86 < .001 .54
Proportion of communicative vocalizations HC 0.69 0.07 9.35 86 < .001 .59
Phonological quality DKCC HC 0.59 0.06 9.41 86 < .001 .60
Proportion of vocalizations with a canonical syllable HC 0.38 0.05 7.26 86 < .001 .44
ACPU-C+V A 0.27 0.10 2.71 87 .01 .08

Note. See Xu (2003) for pseudo R 2 details. Coeff. = unstandardized coefficient; SE = standard error;

HC

= human-coded; AQV = automated quantity of vocalizations (which is the number of child vocalizations);

A

= automated; DKCC = diversity of key consonants used in communication acts (Wetherby et al., 2007; Woynaroski et al., 2017); ACPU-C+V = average count per utterance–consonants + vowels (Woynaroski et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2014).