Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 29;29(2):819–840. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00064
Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity COREQ guide question/description Response
Personal characteristics
 1. Interviewer/facilitator Which author/s conducted the interviews? Principal investigator: Andrea Ash,
 2. Credentials What were the researcher's credentials? E.g., PhD, MD PhD
 3. Occupation What was their occupation at the time of the study? Research assistant professor, lab manager
 4. Gender Was the researcher male or female? Female
 5. Experience and training What experience or training did the researcher have? Sixteen years of assessment experience
Relationship with participants
 6. Relationship established Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? See Method section, para. 2
 7. Participant knowledge of the interviewer What did the participants know about the researcher? E.g., personal goals, reasons for doing the research See Method section, para. 2
 8. Interviewer characteristics What characteristics were reported about the interviewer/facilitator? E.g., bias, assumptions, reasons, and interests in the research topic See Method section, para. 2

Domain 2: Study design
Theoretical framework
 9. Methodological orientation and theory What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? E.g., grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis See Method section, Research Design subsection, para. 1
Participant selection
 10. Sampling How were participants selected? E.g., purposeful, convenience, consecutive, snowball See Method section, para. 4
 11. Method of approach How were participants approached? E.g., face-to-face, telephone, mail, e-mail See Method section, para. 2
 12. Sample size How many participants were in the study? See Method section, para. 2
 13. Nonparticipation How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? See Method section, para. 4
Setting
 14. Setting of data collection Where were the data collected? E.g., home, clinic, workplace See Method section, Data Collection subsection, para. 1
 15. Presence of nonparticipants Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? See Method section, Data Collection subsection, para. 1
 16. Description of sample What are the important characteristics of the sample? E.g., demographic data, date See Method section, para. 2
Data collection
 17. Interview guide Were questions, prompts, and guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? See Method section, Data Collection subsection, paragraph 1
 18. Repeat interviews Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 6
 19. Audio/visual recording Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? See Method section, Data Collection subsection, paragraph 1
 20. Field notes Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? See Method section, Data Collection subsection, paragraph 1
 21. Duration What was the duration of the interviews or focus group? See Results section, Interviews subsection, paragraph 1
 22. Data saturation Was data saturation discussed? See Method section, paragraph 4 and Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 2
 23. Transcripts returned Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 6

Domain 3: Analysis and findings
Data analysis
 24. Number of data coders How many data coders coded the data? See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 1
 25. Description of the coding tree Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraphs 2–5
 26. Derivation of themes Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? See Method section, Research Design subsection, paragraph 2
 27. Software What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 2
 28. Participant checking Did participants provide feedback on the findings? See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 6
Reporting
 29. Quotation presented Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? E.g., participant number Yes. See entire Results section
 30. Data and findings consistent Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? Yes. See entire Discussion section
 31. Clarity of major themes Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? See Results section, Themes subsection
 32. Clarity of minor themes Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? See Results section, Themes subsection