Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity | COREQ guide question/description | Response |
---|---|---|
Personal characteristics | ||
1. Interviewer/facilitator | Which author/s conducted the interviews? | Principal investigator: Andrea Ash, |
2. Credentials | What were the researcher's credentials? E.g., PhD, MD | PhD |
3. Occupation | What was their occupation at the time of the study? | Research assistant professor, lab manager |
4. Gender | Was the researcher male or female? | Female |
5. Experience and training | What experience or training did the researcher have? | Sixteen years of assessment experience |
Relationship with participants | ||
6. Relationship established | Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? | See Method section, para. 2 |
7. Participant knowledge of the interviewer | What did the participants know about the researcher? E.g., personal goals, reasons for doing the research | See Method section, para. 2 |
8. Interviewer characteristics | What characteristics were reported about the interviewer/facilitator? E.g., bias, assumptions, reasons, and interests in the research topic | See Method section, para. 2 |
Domain 2: Study design | ||
Theoretical framework | ||
9. Methodological orientation and theory | What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? E.g., grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis | See Method section, Research Design subsection, para. 1 |
Participant selection | ||
10. Sampling | How were participants selected? E.g., purposeful, convenience, consecutive, snowball | See Method section, para. 4 |
11. Method of approach | How were participants approached? E.g., face-to-face, telephone, mail, e-mail | See Method section, para. 2 |
12. Sample size | How many participants were in the study? | See Method section, para. 2 |
13. Nonparticipation | How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? | See Method section, para. 4 |
Setting | ||
14. Setting of data collection | Where were the data collected? E.g., home, clinic, workplace | See Method section, Data Collection subsection, para. 1 |
15. Presence of nonparticipants | Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? | See Method section, Data Collection subsection, para. 1 |
16. Description of sample | What are the important characteristics of the sample? E.g., demographic data, date | See Method section, para. 2 |
Data collection | ||
17. Interview guide | Were questions, prompts, and guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? | See Method section, Data Collection subsection, paragraph 1 |
18. Repeat interviews | Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? | See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 6 |
19. Audio/visual recording | Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | See Method section, Data Collection subsection, paragraph 1 |
20. Field notes | Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? | See Method section, Data Collection subsection, paragraph 1 |
21. Duration | What was the duration of the interviews or focus group? | See Results section, Interviews subsection, paragraph 1 |
22. Data saturation | Was data saturation discussed? | See Method section, paragraph 4 and Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 2 |
23. Transcripts returned | Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? | See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 6 |
Domain 3: Analysis and findings | ||
Data analysis | ||
24. Number of data coders | How many data coders coded the data? | See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 1 |
25. Description of the coding tree | Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? | See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraphs 2–5 |
26. Derivation of themes | Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? | See Method section, Research Design subsection, paragraph 2 |
27. Software | What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? | See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 2 |
28. Participant checking | Did participants provide feedback on the findings? | See Method section, Interview Transcription and Coding subsection, paragraph 6 |
Reporting | ||
29. Quotation presented | Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? E.g., participant number | Yes. See entire Results section |
30. Data and findings consistent | Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? | Yes. See entire Discussion section |
31. Clarity of major themes | Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? | See Results section, Themes subsection |
32. Clarity of minor themes | Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? | See Results section, Themes subsection |