Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;17(1):e1008584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008584

Table 3. Comparison of simulation methods for blood and oxygen microperfusion.

Model Tissue domain size (mm3) Dimensions (μm) Number of vascular segments (nPts) Number of mesh elements (nVol) CPU time (hrs) Solver type Ref
Dual mesh 0.011 360x200x150 12 NA NA NA [33]
Domain splitting 0.011 350x200x150 ~30 NA NA NA [33]
Singularity removal NA NA ~3,000 NA NA Iterative [35]
Green’s function 0.066 550x520x230 ~100 2,754 >0.28** Iterative* [31]
Dual mesh 0.125 500x500x500 250 ~400,000 0.5 Iterative [42]
Dual mesh 27.000 3000x3000x3000 256,000 600,000 <0.13 Direct [36]
Body fitted tetra 0.024 230x230x450 ~2000 607,406 0.04** NA [30]
Dual mesh 2.709 1345x1456x1383 33,108 ~3,000,000 ~24.00 Iterative [27]
This work (1x1x1) 2.709 1345x1456x1383 33,108 28,930,775 2.58 Iterative -
FEniCS tetra 0.06e-6 ~4x4x4 0 84,000,000 >1000.00 Iterative [37]
This work (3x3x1) 10.800 3000x3000x1200 964,430 95,438,525 19.40 Iterative -

NA indicates the values were not reported

** Time represents a single iteration. Many steps are required (many multiples of this value)

* Only solves for the blood oxygen, not tissue