Table 4.
Hierarchical regression analysis (simultaneous entering of regressors) on prosthesis embodiment with objective-descriptive (model III) and objective-descriptive + subjective-evaluative prosthesis-related factors (model IV) in n = 159 lower limb amputees.
| Model | Regressors | B | SE | β | p | R2 | adjusted R2 | p for R2 | p for R2 increase by including subjective-evaluative regressors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III—Objective-descriptive prosthesis-related regressors | (Constant) | 0.589 | 0.246 | 0.018 | 0.053 | 0.041 | 0.015 | – | |
| Time with current prosthesis | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.035 | 0.658 | |||||
| Prosthesis use frequency | 0.082 | 0.028 | 0.229 | 0.004 | |||||
| IV—Objective-descriptive + subjective-evaluative prosthesis-related regressors | (Constant) | −0.507 | 0.304 | 0.097 | 0.325 | 0.303 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Time with current prosthesis | −0.005 | 0.006 | −0.056 | 0.409 | |||||
| Prosthesis use frequency | 0.044 | 0.025 | 0.122 | 0.076 | |||||
| Visual realism | 0.053 | 0.011 | 0.332 | <0.001 | |||||
| Mobility | 0.021 | 0.004 | 0.334 | <0.001 | |||||
| Residual limb stimulationa | 0.145 | 0.046 | 0.210 | 0.002 |
-1, negative; 0, neutral or absent; +1, positive.