Table 4.
No | References | Year | Lymphocyte definition | Elderly | Young | 1.1.32 CMV Status | Memory definition | Elderly (mean ± SD) | Young (mean ± SD, %) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | n | N | CM | EM | E | N | CM | EM | E | ||||||
1 | Xu et al. (15) | 2019 | γ/δ | 9 | Yes | CD27 CD45RA/CD57+ | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |
2 | Riddell et al. (20) | 2015 | CD8 | 27 | 38 | Yes | CD27 CD45RA | 5,7 ± 1,92 | 4,6 ± 1,42 | 4,0 ± 1,26 | 4,1 ± 1,32 | 10,1 ± 2,82 | 8,2 ± 2,78 | 7,0 ± 2,57 | 7,7 ± 2,73 |
3 | Herndler-Brandstetter et al. (30) | 2008 | CD8 | NR | NR | Yes | CD45RARO/CD28 CD25 | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | ||||||
4 | Mariani et al. (39) | 2003 | CD8 | 10 | 18 | No | Total | ↓ | ↑ | ||||||
5 | Son et al. (50) | 2000 | CD4/CD8 | 30 | 22 | No | Total | CD4+: 6.7 ± 2 CD8+:5.5 ± 1.7 |
CD4+: 8.7 ± 1.7 CD8+: 6.9 ± 1.8 |
1. Vδ1 decrease of telomere length from Naïve to EM ( Figure 3H ), 2. ( Figure 3B ), 3. CD45RO+CD25− from elderly vs CD45RA+CD28+ from young ( Figure 3 ), 4. Young vs 80 years old ( Figure 3B ), 5. Third group: 80–94 years (n = 19) CD4: 6.2 ± 1.9; CD8: 5.1 ± 1.9 ( Table 1 ). The figures and tables correspond to the original article cited. NS, no changes or no significant changes between the groups; NM, not measured; NC, not compared between the groups.