Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;259(2):369–378. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04899-y

Table 3.

Mean and median changes in ophthalmologic assessments in the emixustat and placebo groups, in the study eye

Measurement Mean baseline value (SD) Mean day 85 value (SD) Mean change (SD) Median change (Q1, Q3) Mean baseline value (SD) Mean day 85 value (SD) Mean change (SD) Median change (Q1, Q3) P value Difference in mean changes between groups
All subjects Emixustat group (N = 9) Placebo group (N = 11)
CST (μm) 334.2 (134.1) 322.3 (140.2) − 11.9 (36.5) − 6.0 (− 15, + 2) 297.2 (46.3) 333.4 (103.9) + 36.2 (69.0) + 9.0 (+ 1, + 38) 0.076*
TMV (mm3) 9.90 (1.71) 9.78 (1.71) − 0.13 (0.19) − 0.08 (− 0.20, − 0.01) 9.39 (1.27) 9.63 (1.56) + 0.23 (0.41) + 0.07 (− 0.03, + 0.46) 0.026*
Area of retinal neovascularization (mm2)a 5.52 (7.89) 5.98 (9.91) + 0.46 (3.11) + 0.70 (− 1.55, + 1.79) 1.91 (2.29) 3.07 (3.82) + 1.16 (2.10) + 0.06 (0.00, + 1.86) 0.60
BCVA (letters) 75.2 (6.0) 74.1 (8.2) − 1.1 (8.9) + 2.0 (− 5, + 4) 79.2 (10.4) 78.8 (10.1) − 0.4 (4.1) 0 (− 2, + 3) 0.80
Subjects with DME Emixustat group (N = 5) Placebo group (N = 7)
CST (μm) 388.6 (164.6) 367.4 (180.5) − 21.2 (48.2) − 12.0 (− 22, − 6) 306.3 (51.2) 352.3 (126.8) + 46.0 (86.6) + 8.0 (+ 1, + 79) 0.15
TMV (mm3) 10.65 (1.97) 10.42 (2.03) − 0.23 (0.19) − 0.20 (− 0.29, − 0.08) 9.84 (1.31) 10.09 (1.68) + 0.26 (0.50) + 0.07 (− 0.16, + 0.46) 0.07*

CST, central subfield thickness; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; DME, diabetic macular edema; TMV, total macular volume

aFor area of retinal neovascularization, sample sizes were 6 in the emixustat group and 10 in the placebo group, as the reading center could not determine this measurement at baseline and day 85 in all patients

*Statistically significant difference at the predefined level of 0.10 for this pilot study