TABLE 2.
Mean (SD) values on demographics, clinical and general cognitive data (mean of raw scores and SDs), from PD patients and controls; p-values and effect sizes are provided.
| Variable | PD | Controls | t/U | p-value | d |
| Age | 67.3 (9.7) | 67.1 (5.64) | –0.29 | 0.93 | 0.034 |
| Years of schooling | 13.4 (4.6) | 14.1(3.08 | –0.38 | 0.64 | 0.173 |
| MoCA testa | 26.5 (2.4) | 27.6 (1.2) | –1.2 | 0.14 | 0.561 |
| QUIP-RS | 2.07 (2.53) | 0.53 (0.74) | 2.26 | 0.032 | 0.839 |
| SF-36 physical health | 64.27 (22.75) | 80.13 (6.32) | 39.5 | 0.015§ | –0.649 |
| SF-36 mental health | 59 (9.61) | 77.53 (7.48) | 14 | 0.001§ | –0.876 |
Comparison between PD and control groups (t/U-test significance); PD, Parkinson’s disease; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MoCA maximum score, 30; cut-score ≥ 26; QUIP-RS, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease-Rating Scale; SF-36, Short Form-36 Health Survey. § Mann–Whitney test used. The rest were independent samples t-tests. For the Mann–Whitney test, effect size is given by the rank biserial correlation. aLooking into individual performance, 6 patients were just below the cut off score for mild cognitive impairment (MoCA cut off score = 26): four of these patients’ score was 25 and two patients’ was 22.