Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 11;12(1):373–388. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00980-1

Table 3.

Results of the sensitivity analyses

Analysis Discounted direct costs (SEK) Discounted combined costs (SEK) Discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALYs) ICER (SEK per QALY)a
Smart insulin pen Standard care Difference Smart insulin pen Standard care Difference Smart insulin pen Standard care Difference
Base case 635,599 759,869 − 124,270 1,541,648 2,039,643 − 497,995 14.74 13.59 + 1.15 Smart insulin pens dominant
3-year time horizon 39,204 42,490 − 3286 95,520 141,403 − 45,884 2.21 2.17 + 0.04 Smart insulin pens dominant
5-year time horizon 68,034 76,006 − 7972 171,264 251,522 − 80,258 3.55 3.47 + 0.08 Smart insulin pens dominant
10-year time horizon 147,293 172,482 − 25,190 403,989 579,865 − 175,876 6.45 6.26 + 0.19 Smart insulin pens dominant
Baseline HbA1c of 7.96% (64 mmol/mol) 503,716 590,549 − 86,833 1,232,903 1,630,768 − 397,865 15.80 14.86 + 0.94 Smart insulin pens dominant
Baseline HbA1c of 7.1% (54 mmol/mol) 425,384 483,414 − 58,030 1,046,641 1,383,286 − 336,645 16.52 15.74 + 0.78 Smart insulin pens dominant
HbA1c reduction of 0.4% (4 mmol/mol)b 684,446 759,869 − 75,422 1,656,833 2,039,643 − 382,810 14.38 13.59 + 0.80 Smart insulin pens dominant
HbA1c reduction of 0.8% (9 mmol/mol)b 615,900 759,869 − 143,969 1,489,429 2,039,643 − 550,214 14.91 13.59 + 1.33 Smart insulin pens dominant
HbA1c treatment effect not applied 758,052 759,869 − 1817 1,840,469 2,039,643 − 199,173 13.83 13.59 + 0.24 Smart insulin pens dominant
Hypoglycemia difference not applied 649,065 759,869 − 110,803 1,755,774 2,039,643 − 283,869 14.48 13.59 + 0.90 Smart insulin pens dominant
Treatment switched after 3 yearsc 635,598 663,626 − 28,028 1,541,634 1,648,193 − 106,559 14.74 14.48 + 0.25 Smart insulin pens dominant
Treatment switched after 5 yearsc 635,598 680,623 − 45,025 1,541,635 1,718,398 − 176,763 14.74 14.33 + 0.40 Smart insulin pens dominant
Treatment switched after 10 yearsc 635,598 707,083 − 71,485 1,541,635 1,848,503 − 306,868 14.74 14.04 + 0.70 Smart insulin pens dominant

HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, SEK 2018 Swedish krona

aICER is reported for both direct and combined costs and, in all sensitivity analysis simulations, the outcome of dominance was the same when either direct or combined costs were considered

bFor the smart insulin pen relative to standard care

cIn the standard care simulation arm to smart insulin pen use, performed by removing differences in HbA1c, hypoglycemic event rates, and treatment costs from the time of switch until the end of the time horizon