Table 3.
Analysis | Discounted direct costs (SEK) | Discounted combined costs (SEK) | Discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALYs) | ICER (SEK per QALY)a | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smart insulin pen | Standard care | Difference | Smart insulin pen | Standard care | Difference | Smart insulin pen | Standard care | Difference | ||
Base case | 635,599 | 759,869 | − 124,270 | 1,541,648 | 2,039,643 | − 497,995 | 14.74 | 13.59 | + 1.15 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
3-year time horizon | 39,204 | 42,490 | − 3286 | 95,520 | 141,403 | − 45,884 | 2.21 | 2.17 | + 0.04 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
5-year time horizon | 68,034 | 76,006 | − 7972 | 171,264 | 251,522 | − 80,258 | 3.55 | 3.47 | + 0.08 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
10-year time horizon | 147,293 | 172,482 | − 25,190 | 403,989 | 579,865 | − 175,876 | 6.45 | 6.26 | + 0.19 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
Baseline HbA1c of 7.96% (64 mmol/mol) | 503,716 | 590,549 | − 86,833 | 1,232,903 | 1,630,768 | − 397,865 | 15.80 | 14.86 | + 0.94 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
Baseline HbA1c of 7.1% (54 mmol/mol) | 425,384 | 483,414 | − 58,030 | 1,046,641 | 1,383,286 | − 336,645 | 16.52 | 15.74 | + 0.78 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
HbA1c reduction of 0.4% (4 mmol/mol)b | 684,446 | 759,869 | − 75,422 | 1,656,833 | 2,039,643 | − 382,810 | 14.38 | 13.59 | + 0.80 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
HbA1c reduction of 0.8% (9 mmol/mol)b | 615,900 | 759,869 | − 143,969 | 1,489,429 | 2,039,643 | − 550,214 | 14.91 | 13.59 | + 1.33 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
HbA1c treatment effect not applied | 758,052 | 759,869 | − 1817 | 1,840,469 | 2,039,643 | − 199,173 | 13.83 | 13.59 | + 0.24 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
Hypoglycemia difference not applied | 649,065 | 759,869 | − 110,803 | 1,755,774 | 2,039,643 | − 283,869 | 14.48 | 13.59 | + 0.90 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
Treatment switched after 3 yearsc | 635,598 | 663,626 | − 28,028 | 1,541,634 | 1,648,193 | − 106,559 | 14.74 | 14.48 | + 0.25 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
Treatment switched after 5 yearsc | 635,598 | 680,623 | − 45,025 | 1,541,635 | 1,718,398 | − 176,763 | 14.74 | 14.33 | + 0.40 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
Treatment switched after 10 yearsc | 635,598 | 707,083 | − 71,485 | 1,541,635 | 1,848,503 | − 306,868 | 14.74 | 14.04 | + 0.70 | Smart insulin pens dominant |
HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, SEK 2018 Swedish krona
aICER is reported for both direct and combined costs and, in all sensitivity analysis simulations, the outcome of dominance was the same when either direct or combined costs were considered
bFor the smart insulin pen relative to standard care
cIn the standard care simulation arm to smart insulin pen use, performed by removing differences in HbA1c, hypoglycemic event rates, and treatment costs from the time of switch until the end of the time horizon