Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 15;19(2):1061–1069. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00605-1

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The effect of F. prausnitzii and its EVs on PPARs and ANGPTL4: (a) the Caco-2 cells treated with F. prausnitzii (MOI = 10) and (b) the Caco-2 cells treated at different concentrations of F. prausnitzii–derived EVs (50 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml); *, **, *** p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 were considered statistically significant, respectively. ns represents no significance. GAPDH was used as an internal control