Table 1.
Bone Strain Index reproducibility and clinical studies.
| Topic | Author | Year | Patients no. | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In vivo reproducibility | Messina et al. | 2020 | 30 | BSI in vivo reproducibility of Total Femur (CoV = 3.89%, reproducibility = 89.22%) was better compared to that of Femur Neck (CoV = 4.17%, reproducibility = 88.46%). |
| Prediction of vertebral re-fracture (multicentric retrospective study) | Messina et al. | 2020 | 234 | BSI hazard ratio (95% CI) of incident re-fracture for each unit increase was 1.372 (1.038–1.813), p-value = 0.0261, proportionality test p-value: 0.5179. |
| Bone geometry and structural indexes in Mastocytosis (retrospective study) | Ulivieri et al. | 2020 | 96 | Tryptase showed a statistically inverse correlation with Lumbar Spine BMD (r = −0.2326; p = 0.0226) and with TBS (r = −0.2801; p = 0.0057) and a direct correlation with Lumbar BSI (r = 0.2759; p = 0.0065). In the multivariate regression model only the Lumbar BSI remained statistically significant in systemic Mastocytosis (p = 0.0064) and non-systemic Mastocytosis (p = 0.0338). |
| Prediction of vertebral re-fracture (multicentric retrospective study) | Ulivieri et al. | 2020 | 143 | The hazard ratio of re-fracture for each unit increase of BSI, BMD and TBS were, respectively, 1.201, 0.231, and 0.034. BSI resulted in being the nearest to the statistical significance to predict a re-fracture, with greater values associated with higher re-fracture risk. |
| DXA parameters response to Teriparatide (retrospective study) | Messina et al. | 2020 | 40 | In the entire population, the ameliorations after therapy regarded BSI (-13.9%), TBS (5.08%), BMD (8.36%). Significant HSA variations were shown only at the femoral shaft, but of very small entity [FS_BMD (0.23%), FS_CSA (−0.98%), FS_SEC_MOD (−2.33%) and FS_BR (1.62%)]. |
| In vivo reproducibility | Messina et al. | 2020 | 150 | BSI best reproducibility value was observed in the group with BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2 (CoV 1.97%, reproducibility 94.5%), while the worst was in the group with BMI > 30 kg/m2 (CoV 3.96%, reproducibility 89.0%). BSI reproducibility progressively worsened from lower BMI to higher BMI, but the amount of this reduction was never statistically significant. |
| In vitro reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence | Messina et al. | 2019 | Phantom based study | The highest value of BSI reproducibility was 98.3% (1-cm soft tissue thickness, HD-mode), whereas the lowest one was 96.1% (6 cm soft tissue thickness, HD-mode). Variations between scans with superimposed 0–6 cm thickness of soft tissue were between 0.76% and 1.46% for BMD, and between 1.03% and 1.57% for BSI. |
| DXA derived parameters in haemophilic patients (retrospective study) | Ulivieri et al. | 2018 | 70 | A reduced bone mass was present at the femoral neck in 55.7%, at total femur in 18.6%and at the lumbar spine in 54.3% of patients. Lumbar spine BMD, TBS and lumbar BSI did not correlate with HJHS (Hemophilia Joint Health Score). HSA bone geometric parameters correlated negatively with HJHS. |
| Clinical observational retrospective study | Ulivieri et al. | 2018 | 125 | A low fracture risk seems to be related to a low carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen level. In contrast, a positive Romberg test, together with compromised BSI, appears to be strictly connected with fragility fractures characterizing the pathway leading to fracture in postmenopausal women. |