Table 5.

Detailed quality scores for the eligible reliability studies

	Sample characteristics described with details	Raters competence described	Index test sufficiently described	Study withdrawals explained	Appropriate statistical methods	Between observer blinding	Within observer blinding	Order of examination varied	Time between testing and theoretical stability	Score percentage (quality)
ROM
Bahat et al. [19]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	6/9 (67%) Moderate
Eini et al. [21]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	N/A	No	N/A	Yes	6/7 (86%) High
Balance and postural sway
Wikstrom [22]	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	N/A	No	N/A	Yes	4/7 (57%) Moderate
Jorgensen et al. [23]	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	N/A	No	N/A	Yes	4/7 (57%) Moderate
Guzman and Aktan [24]	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	N/A	Yes	3/8 (38%) Fair
Reaction time
Jorgensen et al. [25]	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	N/A	No	N/A	Yes	4/7 (57%) Moderate
Accuracy and velocity
Bahat et al. [27]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	N/A	Yes	Yes	6/8 (75%) Moderate

N/A, not applicable

Poor: 0–22%; fair: 23–56%; moderate: 57–78%; high: > 78%