Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;147(4):1–10. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5261

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the 19 Included Studiesa.

Source Study type No.b Age, mean (range), yc Women, No. (%) T stage (No. patients) MINORS criteria score
Patients with dnSCC Patients with IPSCC dnSCC IPSCC dnSCC IPSCC
Direct comparative studies
Lavertu et al18 Cohort study 38 10 60.3 (23-80) NA NA T1 (3), T2 (9), T3 (20), T4 (16) for both cohorts NA 16
de Almeida et al17 Cohort study 21 13 57.0 (SD, 13) NA NA T1 (0), T2 (1), T3 (2), T4 (18) T1 (2), T2 (2), T3 (2), T4 (7) 17
Lobo et al6 Cohort study 88 29 63.5 (NA) 32 (36) 10 (34) T1 (8), T2 (10), T3 (9), T4 (52), Tx (9) T1 (3), T2 (4), T3 (4), T4 (11), Tx (7) 16
Yan et al19 Cohort study 28 38 mean (SD), 62.5 (13.2) for dnSCC, 59.9 (11.5) for IPSCC 13 (46) 13 (34) T1 (7), T2 (4), T3 (6), T4 (11) T1 (14), T2 (5), T3 (7), T4 (10), Tx (2) 19
Yu et al20 Cohort study 65 21 mean (SD), 58.8 (12.8) for dnSCC, 60.9 (10.3) for IPSCC 17 (26) 4 (19) T1 (3), T2 (9), T3 (22), T4 (31) T1 (4), T2 (5), T3 (6), T4 (6) 17
Only dnSCC
Haraguchi30 Case series 15 0 55.1 2 (13) 0 NA T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) 7
Dulguerov et al28 Cohort study 126 0 56.7 (9-86) NA 0 T1 (18), T2 (26), T3 (27), T4 (52) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) 11
Only IPSCC
Hug et al32 Case series 0 18 54.5 (21-73) 0 5 (28) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) NA 8
Lesperance et al36 Case series 0 14 67.0 (51-82) 0 2 (14) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1-T3 (7), T4 (7) 12
Buiret et al25 Case series 0 11 60.0 (42-79) 0 3 (27) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (2), T2 (1), T3 (5), T4 (3) 9
Choi et al26 Case series 0 18 59.4 (42-86) 0 4 (22) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (5), T2 (2), T3 (8), T4 (3) 11
Kim et al34 Cohort study 0 16 56.5 (31-74) 0 1 (6) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (1), T2 (4), T3 (2), T4 (9) 10
Hong et al31 Cohort study 0 17 55.9 (35-77) 0 1 (6) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (1), T2 (3), T3 (8), T4 (5) 10
Yu et al46 Cohort study 0 32 56.5 (NA) 0 7 (22) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (3), T2 (10), T3 (16), T4 (3) 11
Liang et al39 Cohort study 0 87 54.0 (17-80) 0 23 (26) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (2), T2 (12), T3 (30), T4 (43) 10
Karligkiotis et al33 Cohort study 0 34 60.2 (34-80) 0 11 (32) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (11), T2 (7), T3 (11), T4 (5) 12
Yasumatsu et al45 Case series 0 15 61.0 (39-81) 0 7 (47) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (2), T2 (3), T3 (6), T4 (4) 10
Li et al38 Cohort study 0 120 54.8 (17-82) 0 33 (28) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (0), T2 (32), T3 (36), T4 (52) 11
Li et al37 Cohort study 0 21 59.2 (35-81) 0 3 (14) T1 (0), T2 (0), T3 (0), T4 (0) T1 (2), T2 (1), T3 (10), T4 (8) 12

Abbreviations: dn, de novo; IP, inverted papilloma; MINORS, methodological index for nonrandomized studies; NA, not available; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; T, tumor.

a

Table is divided into studies that directly compare between patients with dnSCC and IPSCC, studies of patients with only dnSCC, and studies of patients with only IPSCC.

b

No. indicates cohort size.

c

Values written as mean (range) unless otherwise indicated.