Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 19;17(1):e1009241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009241

Fig 1. Accuracy of FST and kinship estimators: Overview of models and results.

Fig 1

Our analysis is based on the generalized FST definition (section The generalized FST for arbitrary population structures) and two parallel models: the “Coancestry Model” for individual-specific allele frequencies (πij), and the “Kinship Model” for genotypes (xij). The “Coancestry in Terms of Kinship” panel connects kinship (φjkT, fjT) and coancestry (θjkT) parameters (section The kinship and coancestry models). We use these models to study the accuracy of FST and kinship method-of-moment estimators under arbitrary population structures. The “Indep. Subpop. FST Estimator” panel shows the bias resulting from the misapplication of FST estimators for independent subpopulations (F^STindep) to arbitrary structures (section FST estimation based on the independent subpopulations model), as calculated under the coancestry model. The “Existing Kinship Estimator” panel shows the bias in the standard kinship model estimator (φ^jkT,std) and its resulting plug-in FST estimator (F^STstd; section Characterizing a kinship estimator and its relationship to FST), as calculated under the kinship model. The “New Kinship Estimator” panel presents a new statistic Ajk that estimates kinship with a uniform bias, which together with a consistent estimator of its minimum value (A^min) results in our new kinship (φ^jkT,new) and FST (F^STnew) estimators, which are consistent under arbitrary population structure (section A new approach for kinship and FST estimation).