Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;98(12):skaa359. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa359

Table 5.

Alpha diversity of rumen content and rumen papillae

Observed bacterial species P-value1 Simpson’s Diversity Index (1-D) P-value1
Sample source Rumen content (n = 59) 274 ± 63 0.0508 0.95 ± 0.03 <0.001
Rumen papillae (n = 59) 303 ± 64 0.98 ± 0.01
Rumen content P-value2 Rumen papillae P-value2 Rumen content P-value2 Rumen papillae P-value2
Liver abscesses Healthy (n = 30) 282 ± 60 >0.05 308 ± 71 >0.05 0.96 ± 0.03 >0.05 0.98 ± 0.01 >0.05
Liver abscessed (n = 29) 265 ± 66 298 ± 56 0.95 ± 0.04 0.98 ± 0.01
Sex Steers (n = 39) 272 ± 63 >0.05 301 ± 66 >0.05 0.96 ± 0.03 >0.05 0.98 ± 0.01 >0.05
Heifers (n = 20) 280 ± 65 308 ± 60 0.94 ± 0.04 0.98 ± 0.01
Diet Limonene (28) 274 ± 73 >0.05 310 ± 68 >0.05 0.95 ± 0.04 >0.05 0.98 ± 0.01 >0.05
No limonene (31) 274 ± 53 297 ± 60 0.96 ± 0.03 0.98 ± 0.01

1Alpha diversity differences between different sample sources (rumen content vs. rumen papillae) were tested with Friedman’s test.

2Alpha diversity differences between different variables (healthy vs. liver abscess, Steer vs. Heifers, and limonene vs. no limonene) within rumen content or rumen papillae samples were tested with Wilcox test.