Table 3.
MiSARA app acceptability (n=39).
| Content area and item | Participants, n (%)a | |
| Appearance | ||
|
|
Overall |
|
|
|
Appealing design |
|
|
|
Interactivity |
|
| Enjoyment | ||
|
|
Fun to use |
|
|
|
Interesting |
|
|
|
Aquarium fun to use |
|
|
|
Aquarium influenced time using app |
|
| Content | ||
|
|
Messages appropriate for age |
|
| Data acceptability | ||
|
|
Comfort answering self-report questions |
|
|
|
Comfort with passive data collection in app |
|
|
|
Prefer self-reporting in MiSARA rather than by text or phone |
|
| Technical issues | ||
|
|
Easy to use |
|
|
|
Clear app use instructions |
|
|
|
Frequency of problems |
|
aPercent rated 3 or higher (eg, somewhat) unless otherwise indicated.