Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;25(1):269–283. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02965-4

Table 3.

Estimated item response probabilities of self-reported use of HIV prevention methods among the HIV-positive participants of the Engage-Montreal study, 2017–2018 (n = 200): 3 class model

Variable Class 1: Mostly ART with viral suppression
n = 87
(53%, 95% CI 41–65%)
Class 2: ART with viral suppression and condom use
n = 46
(19%, 95% CI 16–41%)
Class 3: ART with viral suppression and seroadaptive behaviour use
n = 67
(18%, 95% CI 10–27%)
ART with viral suppression 84% 86% 93%
Consistent condom use 0% 100% 15%
Strategic positioning 0% 29% 49%
Serosorting and/or PrEP sorting:
 Both 0% 8% 55%
 PrEP sorting only 9% 0% 16%
 Serosorting only 18% 3% 17%

ART antiretroviral treatment, CI confidence interval, PrEP pre-exposure prophylaxis

RDS-II adjusted class sizes (%) and 95% confidence intervals are presented. RDS-II weights are inverse probability of sampling weights that are proportional to participant network size