Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 10;5(1):121–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.018

Table IV.

Fracture rates overall and compared to Zumstein et al

Studies included Shoulders Fx present Rate, % P value
Current study Vs. Zumstein et al
 Intraop. humerus Fx 94 5539 97 1.8 .56
 Intraop. glenoid Fx 94 5539 15 0.3 .01∗
 Postop. humerus Fx 94 5539 69 1.2 .71
 Postop. glenoid Fx 94 5539 6 0.1
Zumstein et al Vs. current study
 Intraop. humerus Fx 21 782 16 2.0 .56
 Intraop. glenoid Fx 21 782 7 0.9 .01∗
 Postop. humerus Fx 21 782 11 1.4 .71
 Postop. glenoid Fx 21 782 NR NR
Current study: subtotal of non-Grammont designs Vs. Zumstein et al
 Intraop. humerus Fx 1057 0 0.0 <.001
 Intraop. glenoid Fx 1057 1 0.1 .01∗
 Postop. humerus Fx 1057 23 2.2 .23
 Postop. glenoid Fx 1057 1 0.1

Intraop, intraoperatively; Postop., postoperatively; Fx, fracture; NR, not reported; JSES, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

Intraoperative glenoid fracture rates and intraoperative humerus fracture using modern non-Grammont designs have significantly decreased compared with Zumstein et al (JSES, 2011).

Bold indicates statistical significance (P < .05).