. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Dec 3;122:108227. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108227

Table 3.

Concurrent associations between the incentive salience construct and alcohol use, inventory of drinking situations, and sex.

	Baseline r (95% CI), p-value
Percent Days Abstinent	−0.284 (−0.370, −0.197), p<.001
Drinks per Drinking Day	0.431 (0.356, 0.506), p<.001
Drinks per Day	0.447 (0.379, 0.514), p<.001
Percent Heavy Drinking Days	0.345 (0.261, 0.430), p<.001
IDS Testing Personal Control	0.384 (0.308, 0.461), p<.001
IDS Urges and Temptation	0.529 (0.460, 0.599), p<.001
IDS Social Pressure	0.549 (0.481, 0.617), p<.001
Sex (0 = women, 1 = men)	−0.022 (−0.121, 0.076), p=.656
Family history (0 = no, 1 = yes)	0.134 (0.034, 0.235), p=.009
Religious Background and Behavior	−0.065 (−0.204, 0.075), p=.366
SSQ Friend Social Support	−0.135 (−0.230, −0.040), p=.006
SSQ Family Social Support	−0.097 (−0.198, 0.003), p=.058

Note. IDS = Inventory of Drinking Situations; SSQ = Social Support Questionnaire; 95% CI = bootstrapped 95% confidence interval; confidence intervals that do not include zero represent statistically significant associations between the incentive salience construct and concurrent alcohol use and drinking situations.