Table 1.
Author | Year | Country | Study area | Average herd size | Period of study | Risk factor analysis | Gross national income per capita [38] | Is Q fever a mandatory notifiable disease? | Molecular approach | Target gene | N herds in study area | Percentage of herds sampled | BTM(i) samples tested | Positive BTM samples | Prevalence | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boroduske et al. [43] | 2017 | Latvia | Nationwide | 8.6 | 2015 | Yes | High-income | Yes | qPCR | IS1111 | 5040 | 5 | 252 | 27 | 10.7 | 7.2 | 14.9 |
Kargar et al. [23] | 2013 | Iran | Johrom | 3.7 | – | Yes | Upper-middle-income | Yes | nPCR | com1 | 3000 | 3.3 | 100 | 11 | 11 | 5.5 | 18.0 |
Seo et al. [44] | 2018 | South Korea | Gyeongsang | 74 | 2015 | No | High-income | Yes | nPCR | 16S rRNA | 869 | 69.9 | 607 | 108 | 17.8 | 14.8 | 20.9 |
Rahimi et al. [45] | 2010 | Iran | Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari | 48 | 2008 | No | Upper-middle-income | Yes | nPCR | com1 | 95 | 29.5 | 28 | 5 | 17.9 | 5.5 | 34.5 |
van Engelen et al. [46] | 2014 | Netherlands | Nationwide | 71.7 | 2009–2011 | Yes | High-income | Yes | qPCR | IS1111 | 20,746 | 1.5 | 309 | 58 | 18.8 | 14.6 | 23.3 |
Anastácio et al. [47] | 2016 | Portugal | Nationwide | 21.7 | 2009–2013 | Yes | High-income | No | PCR | IS1111 | 1712 | 2.6 | 45 | 9 | 20 | 10.9 | 33.8 |
Velasova et al. [48] | 2017 | UK | Nationwide | 133 | 2014–2015 | No | High-income | No | qPCR | icd/IS1111 | 10,491 | 2.1 | 220 | 57 | 25.9 | 20.3 | 31.9 |
Czaplicki et al. [49] | 2012 | Belgium | Wallonia | 28.5 | 2006 | Yes | High-income | No | qPCR | IS1111 | 5086 | 1 | 50 | 15 | 30 | 8.7 | 51.3 |
Magnino et al. [50] | 2009 | Italy | Cremona, Montova and Pavia | 180 | 2007–2008 | No | High-income | No | PCR | IS1111 | 3550 | 11.2 | 400 | 161 | 40.2 | 35.5 | 45.1 |
Valla et al. [51] | 2014 | Italy | Nationwide | 42.5 | 2011–2013 | No | High-income | No | PCR | IS1111 | 30,000 | 1.1 | 344 | 138 | 40.1 | 35.0 | 45.4 |
Contreras et al. [37] | 2015 | Colombia | Monteria | 150–600 | 2012 | No | Upper-middle-income | No | PCR | IS1111 | 3341 | 0.3 | 11 | 5 | 45.5 | 16.7 | 75.8 |
Astobiza et al. [52] | 2012 | Spain | Bizkaia | 46.1 | 2009–2010 | No | High-income | No / Yes(ii) | qPCR | IS1111 | 178 | 100 | 178 | 92 | 51.7 | 44.4 | 59 |
Muskens et al. [25] | 2011 | Netherlands | Nationwide | 65.7 | 2007 | No | High-income | Yes | qPCR | IS1111 | 21,313 | 1.6 | 341 | 193 | 56.6 | 50.7 | 61.9 |
Vicari et al. [34] | 2013 | Italy | Lombardy | 182 | 2011 | No | High-income | No | PCR | IS1111 | 5750 | 5 | 287 | 173 | 60.3 | 54.5 | 65.9 |
Bauer et al. [53] | 2015 | USA | Indiana | 145.3 | 2011 | No | High-income | Yes | qPCR | IS1111 | 1225 | 25.8 | 316 | 193 | 61.1 | 55.6 | 66.4 |
Gyuranecz et al. [54] | 2012 | Hungary | Nationwide | 14.5 | 2010–2011 | No | High-income | Yes | qPCR | IS1111 | 17,172 | 0.1 | 15 | 10 | 66.7 | 40.5 | 88.7 |
APHIS [55] | 2007 | USA | 18 states(iii) | 162.6 | 2007 | No | High-income | Yes | qPCR | IS1111 | 54,100 | 1 | 528 | 406 | 76.9 | 73.2 | 80.4 |
(i): BTM: bulk-tank milk samples, one per herd; PCR: conventional PCR; qPCR: real-time PCR; nPCR: nested PCR. (ii) mandatory notification in Basque Country. (iii) California, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin.